Compare

How QuroPanel compares

A factual comparison against the panels providers already use.

Every competitor entry is a fact the vendor publishes in their own documentation or pricing. cPanel, Plesk, DirectAdmin, aaPanel and CloudPanel are all capable products; this table shows where QuroPanel differs, not that the others are bad. Verify against each vendor's own site before deciding, and note that QuroPanel's column is mostly planned because it is pre-1.0.

Capability	QuroPanel	cPanel & WHM	Plesk	DirectAdmin	aaPanel	CloudPanel
Licence	Open source, AGPL-3.0 intended	Proprietary	Proprietary	Proprietary	Open core, proprietary Pro	Open source, MIT
Cost model	Free self-hosted	Per-account tiers	Per-server tiers	Per-server tiers	Free tier plus Pro	Free
Source available	✓	—	—	—	●	✓
Server administration	Planned	✓	✓	✓	✓	●
Reseller accounts	Planned	✓	✓	✓	●	—
Master reseller	Planned	●	●	✓	—	—
Multi-server	Planned	●	●	●	●	—
WordPress toolkit	Planned	✓	✓	●	✓	✓
Node.js and Python apps	Planned	●	✓	●	●	✓
Container support	Planned	●	✓	—	✓	—
Built-in billing	Planned	—	—	—	●	—
Domain registration	Planned	—	—	—	—	—
Integrated security stack	Planned	●	●	●	✓	●
Migration tooling	Planned	✓	✓	✓	●	●
Public API	Planned	✓	✓	✓	✓	●
Native mobile apps	Planned	—	—	—	✓	—
Self-hosting rights	✓	licence required	licence required	licence required	✓	✓

✓ available ● partial or add-on — not offered Planned = specified, not yet built

Follow the build

The roadmap shows what is specified, what is being built and what is still only planned.

View the roadmap

Contribute

Drivers, integrations, translations and documentation are all places to start.

How to contribute

Report a security issue

Responsible disclosure, with a stated response commitment.

Disclosure policy